Limit Poker Half Kill
Limit Poker Half Kill Rating: 8,9/10 2156 votes
Continuing from my last post, I’ve got another big, basic strategy mistake I see even a lot of good players make in the $15-30 fixed limit game I play in. The mistake is this: they don’t adjust their strategy to the fact that it’s a kill game.
Omaha Hi-Lo is a split pot game, with half of the pot going to the best high hand, and the other half going to the best qualifying low hand. In order for a low hand to qualify, it must consist of five unpaired cards of eight or lower. Additionally, the player who triggered the situation is required to seed the pot with some amount, usually double the regular big blind. A 'half kill' means that the stakes are raised by 50.
For those of you unfamiliar with what a kill is, here’s how it works; if a player wins two pots in a row, the next hand become double the stakes (in this case, $30-60) and the player who “killed” it has to put a live $30 in the pot (live meaning it counts as the player’s call of the big blind, as opposed to just being dead money in the pot). In most games, there is a certain amount of money the second pot has to be over in order to qualify as a kill. In our game it’s 10 times the small blind, or $150. (Here’s a link to the Wikipedia definition of ‘kill game’.)
What this means is that players should be playing more tight than usual after winning a pot. This is because you are essentially “punished” for winning two pots in a row by having to pay $30. Essentially, if you win two pots in a row, you are essentially losing one BB (big bet) (in actuality it is a bit less than one big bet because you will always have some equity in the following hand, but you’re still losing most of that bet in the long run.)
So in order to enter the pot after the hand you win, you must have a better than average hand. In other words, you should not be making a slim pre-flop raise with the intention of stealing, because if you’re in such a situation, chances are that if you do end up winning that pot and killing it, the pot will only just be over the minimum $150, and then that small pot will have $30 taken out of it when you have to put up your forced bet.
Additionally, if you do make that slim pre-flop raise and end up taking down a small pot, even if it’s not a kill, you still are on the verge of having a kill, so the very next hand you will still have to take into account these considerations again. Better to just fold the marginal hand you were thinking about raising with and get the kill off you.
After I’ve just won a pot, I’ll sometimes find myself in late position with a bunch of folds in front of me, looking down at K9 suited or something and then telling myself “no, just fold–it’s not worth it in this situation.”
Limit Poker Half Kill Game
This seems like common sense to me, but you’d be surprised how many young, aggressive players actively pursue getting the kill pot going, like it’s a badge of honor or exciting in some way to be the one to make it a kill pot. People actually seem to play looser than they usually would. People talk about “okay, going for the kill”, and some of that is just silly talk, but some of the players actually mean it. It’s also true that these players want to play higher (because the full $30-60 game only goes once a week) so they are fiending a bit for action.
And even though you yourself should be playing tighter the hand after you win a pot, you should encourage other players’ pursuit of the kill as much as you can. That kind of behavior is definitely good for the game and good for your bottom line (assuming you’re comfortable playing at the kill stakes).
Robert Woolley
In this mini-series within a larger series of articles for those new to live poker, I've been discussing all of the different kinds of buttons that you might encounter at casino poker tables. There's much more to explain, so let's get right to it.
The Kill & Half-Kill Buttons
'Kill' is one of those words that has a specific and non-obvious meaning in poker that seems completely divorced from its more familiar use outside of the game.
In poker, a 'kill pot' means a hand in which the stakes of the game are doubled from their usual amount. For example, when the 'kill' is on, the bets in a $2/$4 fixed-limit Omaha hi/lo game suddenly become $4 and $8, although usually the blinds remain the same.
Additionally, the player who triggered the situation is required to seed the pot with some amount, usually double the regular big blind. A 'half kill' means that the stakes are raised by 50 percent — in the example given, to $3/$6. You will never find both a full kill and a half kill being employed in the same game; it's one or the other, or neither, never both.
What causes a kill or half kill to go into effect? The most common triggers are (1) a player winning two pots in a row, or (2) a player winning a pot over a certain threshold amount. Again, these will never both be possibilities in one game.
The other side of a 'kill' button will usually say either 'no kill' or 'leg up.' 'Leg up' is the term for a player who has just won a pot; it means if he wins the next hand, too, he will be required to 'kill' the pot after that with that extra double blind. If that happens, the dealer will flip the button so that the 'kill' (or 'half kill') side is up.
No Limit Poker
If the casino is using the pot-size trigger, the dealer will usually keep the 'kill' button either in the tray until a player wins a qualifying pot, or will keep it nearby with the 'no kill' side up until the kill is in effect.
I realize that this all sounds complicated just reading about it, especially if you have not encountered this kind of game before. After doing it a time or two, though, you'll find that it all makes perfect sense and you'll wonder how you could ever have been confused about it.
The All In & Call Buttons
I lived and played poker in Vegas for a couple of years before I first started to see 'All In' and 'Call' buttons.
They are a fairly new development, and they seem to be getting more widely adopted, in both cash games and tournaments.
There is no mystery to these buttons. The dealer places the 'All In' button on the table in front of a player who has either moved all of his chips forward, or has made a verbal declaration that he is 'all in.' If another player calls that bet, that player will get the 'call' button.
The purpose of these is simply to add a visual cue to these important actions, lest any player miss them from inattention, excessive ambient noise in the poker room, or for other reasons. It is hoped that placing these markers on the table will reduce the number of times that an argument breaks out along the lines of, 'I didn't hear him say he was all in! I wouldn't have called if I had known that!'
Limit Poker Half Kill Two
The Overs Button
Use of the 'Overs' button is sufficiently rare that you'll probably have to go out of your way to find it. In six years of regular play in Las Vegas, I only saw them being used in two casinos.
The basic idea is that these buttons turn a limit game into a no-limit game under certain conditions. Each player can choose to either have or not have an 'overs' button. If at any point in the hand, the only players left contesting the pot all have an 'overs' button, then the betting changes to no-limit.
Personally, I don't like playing this way. I want my game to be either limit or no-limit. I don't mind if it changes between hands, as in a mixed game, but I don't want the structure of the betting to change in the middle of a hand. But some people find it to be great fun to suddenly have a pot become turbo-charged.
The Third Man Walking Button
Fortunately, the 'Third Man Walking' button has nothing to do with a depressing Sean Penn movie. Rather, some casinos have what they call a 'third man walking' rule, and this button signals that the rule is in effect.
The rule is intended to prevent a cascade or domino effect of players taking breaks. Some players severely dislike playing with several empty spots at the table. Such players will either take a break or just refuse to participate if three or more other players are simultaneously absent.
Of course, each such refusenik reduces the size of the game and is liable to trigger others to sit out, too. In this manner, three people gone can cause what had been a lively game to grind to an immediate halt.
To combat this, the 'third man walking' rule says that a maximum of two players can be absent from the game at once. If a third person — it can be man or woman, of course (don't blame me for the sexist name, I didn't make it up!) — also decides to take a break, the player can only be gone until the big blind is due. If the player has not returned by then, the chips are picked up and the seat is given away to whomever is next on the waiting list. That way, even if a game has three people missing, it isn't for more than one round of play.
The 'third man walking' button, then, is put in front of the seat of a player who steps away from the game when two other players are already absent. It serves both as a warning that the rule is in effect, and a promise to the remaining players that they won't be three people short for very long. Only a minority of casinos have this rule, so most likely you won't run into the situation, but it's best to be aware of it just in case.
All right, that puts us about three-fourths of the way through the catalog of poker-table buttons. Next week we'll get the subject all buttoned up.
Thanks to Dominick Muzio at the TI poker room and to Kristi Smith of the Mirage poker room (both in Las Vegas) for the photographs. Robert Woolley lives in Asheville, NC. He spent several years in Las Vegas and chronicled his life in poker on the 'Poker Grump' blog.
Tags
cash game strategytournament strategylive casino pokerbeginner strategyrulesetiquettebuttons